Brave Browser Reportedly Looking for Over $30 Million in Series A Funding Round

Support CryptoGlobe and Brave by trying out the Brave browser.


The privacy-centric Brave browser is reportedly looking to raise between $30 and $50 million at a valuation of $133 million through a Series A funding round, nearly two years after raising $35 million in less than a minute through an initial coin offering (ICO).

This, according to a report by CoinDesk, citing sources familiar with the matter. The firm behind the privacy-centric Brave browser and the Basic Attention Token (BAT) has also raised $4.5 million in a seed round from the Digital Currency Group, Pantera Capital, and more.

Brave is notably led by JavaScript creator and former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich, and by default blocks ads and trackers for its users. To reward publishers and give advertisers a chance, the browser uses its BAT, which is also used to reward users.

The company’s Brave Ads program has recently been rolled out, and in it users are rewarded in BAT for seeing ads, with a portion of the revenue going to websites they visit and to Brave itself. The premise of rewarding users for surging the web while protecting their privacy has made it popular

Currently, Brave’s ads appear to those who opt-in as pop-ups, and aren’t yet available to users in every country and will be rolled out in the near future to the rest of the world. Per Eich, users can earn as much as $5 per month worth of BAT using the browser.

Tokens the users earn are by default distributed to websites they visit, according to time spent on them. Users may, however, chose to tip them, or to keep them until they’re able to withdraw them.

Last month Gab, a purportedly uncensored social media microblogging platform, forked the Brave browser to create a “free-speech browser” and a “free-speech marketplace and app store,” that are powered by bitcoin, instead of BAT.

Bitcoin Proponents Debate a Potential Hard Fork for Inflation

  • Bitcoin Advisory founder Pierre Rochard is asking bitcoin community to consider the implementation of inflation.
  • Rochard argues that transaction fees alone may not be enough to sustain miners in the future. 

Pierre Rochard, founder of consulting firm Bitcoin Advisory, has addresed a debate in the bitcoin community over whether transaction fees will be high enough to support the network’s continued use. 

Bitcoin Inflation Debate

According to Rochard, who is also a self-proclaimed proponent of BTC’s scaling solution lightning network, the community must question whether transaction fees alone will be enough incentive for miners in the future. As outlined in the original white paper, bitcoin’s total supply is limited to 21 million coins. 

While the final BTC is not expected to be minted until after the year 2140, the block reward will continue to decline over the coming century. Miners, who facilitate transactions and secure bitcoin’s network, will have to rely more upon transaction fees as a source of income, as BTC rewards continue to fall.

Some are now arguing that bitcoin may need to introduce perpetual inflation to remedy the situation, which would mean altering the original 21 million BTC total supply.

Rochard said, 

There’s an open question of will transaction fees be high enough – or in the aggregate total – enough to provide transaction finality...will bitcoin have to hard fork in inflation?

The Bitcoin Advisory founder asked the community to consider the state of altcoins, many of which operate on an inflationary protocol. Rochard acknowledged that confirmation bias may be clouding judgment in regard to bitcoin’s managed development and that the potential for inflation should at least be considered, 

There’s confirmation bias. We’re all very bullish on bitcoin, I certainly am, and so we want to pick out arguments and facts that support our position rather than trying to see all sides of a debate and have a more balanced view. Or at least have some level of uncertainty and self awareness in how much support we actually have for our arguments.

Future of BTC

Rochard pointed to an article written in 2015 by Silicon Valley entrepreneur Ryan Selkis, under the name TwoBitIdiot, arguing that bitcoin needed inflation despite the controversy of the idea. He also pointed to the increase in block size from 1MB, which at the time was considered blasphemous to bitcoin’s protocol, as analogous to the idea of introducing inflation. 

Rochard concluded that the bitcoin community has “a good 10 to 20 years to argue about it,” before inflation becomes a pressing issue. 

 

Featured Image Credit: Photo via Pixabay.com