Bloomberg Analyst Predicts a Strong Chance of Coinbase Overcoming SEC Lawsuit

The legal battle between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the U.S., has reached a critical juncture, attracting widespread attention within the cryptocurrency industry and beyond. This in-depth report combines insights from Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst Elliot Z. Stein with details from a Reuters report to provide a comprehensive overview of the case.

Background of the Case

• SEC Lawsuit Against Coinbase: Initiated in June 2023, the SEC’s lawsuit alleges that Coinbase facilitated trading of at least 13 crypto tokens, including Solana, Cardano, and Polygon, which, according to the SEC, should have been registered as securities.
• Coinbase’s Defense: Coinbase argues that crypto assets traded on its platform do not satisfy the elements of the Howey test, which defines what constitutes an investment contract (and therefore securities). The firm also maintains that it had fair notice from the SEC, especially after the SEC approved its IPO in 2021.

Developments from the January 17 Hearing

• Judge Katherine Polk Failla’s Inquiry: The hearing, conducted by Federal Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan, centered on both parties’ divergent views regarding the classification of digital assets as securities. The judge focused her questions on the legal precedent defining securities and the specific attributes of the crypto tokens in question.
• Length and Complexity of the Hearing: Lasting over four hours, the hearing did not result in an immediate decision, indicating the judge’s careful consideration of the complex issues at hand.
• Implications of the Judge’s Decision: Judge Failla’s eventual ruling is expected to have significant repercussions for digital assets, potentially clarifying the SEC’s jurisdiction over the sector.

Key Arguments and Counterarguments

• SEC’s Position: The SEC, represented by assistant chief litigation counsel Patrick Costello, argued that the crypto tokens at the heart of the case support a larger “enterprise,” likening them to an investment contract. In an interesting analogy, the SEC lawyers compared the purchase of these digital assets on secondary markets, such as Coinbase’s platform, to investments similar to stock shares or bonds. They also referenced the 1990s trend of Beanie Babies, a collectible craze where Americans bought the dolls with the expectation that their value would rise, to illustrate their point on investment expectations with digital tokens.
• Coinbase’s Rebuttal: William Savitt, representing Coinbase, countered that buyers of such tokens do not enter into contracts entitling them to proceeds from a common enterprise. He stressed that the current lawsuit could potentially stretch the definition of securities beyond its intended scope, challenging the application of the major questions doctrine. Savitt emphasized that this doctrine requires specific congressional authorization for federal agencies to regulate, which he argued the SEC lacks in this context.
• Concerns About “Staking” Program: The SEC targeted Coinbase’s “staking” program, arguing that it should have been registered with the agency. This program involves pooling assets to verify activity on blockchain networks and providing “rewards” to customers.

Bloomberg Intelligence’s Analysis by Elliot Z. Stein

• Initial Analysis (January 16)
  • Prediction of Victory: Stein projected a high likelihood, approximately 70%, of Coinbase prevailing against the SEC lawsuit. This was based on the anticipation of the oral arguments scheduled for January 17 regarding Coinbase’s motion for judgment on the pleadings against the SEC’s enforcement action.
  • Decision Timeline: A decision on the motion was expected in either the second or third quarter of the year.
  • Dismissal of Primary Claims: Stein anticipated that Coinbase would succeed in getting the SEC’s primary claims dismissed, although some claims, particularly those related to staking, might initially survive but could be quashed later.
  • Key Arguments and Fair-Notice Defenses: Stein highlighted Coinbase’s arguments that the crypto assets traded on its platform do not meet the criteria of the Howey test for investment contracts. Additionally, Coinbase’s defense included the fair-notice argument, supported by the SEC’s approval of its IPO in 2021.
• Follow-Up Analysis (January 18)
  • Reaffirmation of Victory Likelihood: Post-hearing, Stein reiterated the belief that Coinbase is 70% likely to win the motion, bolstered by the arguments presented during the hearing.
  • Judge’s Inquiry for Limiting Principle: Judge Failla sought a limiting principle for the SEC’s definition of “investment contract” that would not include collectibles. Stein found Coinbase’s definition, requiring investment in a business rather than just an ecosystem, along with an enforceable obligation, to be more compelling.
  • Reference to Ripple Ruling: Stein referenced the Ripple ruling from July, suggesting that sales of digital assets on public exchanges don’t align well with the Howey test criteria.
  • Potential Supreme Court Involvement: Stein anticipated that the case, if it survives, is likely to reach the Supreme Court, potentially resulting in a narrowing of the Howey test.
  • Coinbase’s Arguments Against Staking Claims: Stein noted Coinbase’s strong position against the SEC’s staking claim, based on their definition of “investment.”
  • Broker Function Allegations: He also mentioned that Coinbase had robust arguments contesting the SEC’s allegations that it was performing broker functions.

Featured Image via Pixabay