Further Scrutiny for Facebook’s Libra As Money Laundering Regulators Zone In

Will Heasman

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) aka the world's money laundering watchdog has announced its intention to keep a sharp eye on Facebook's emerging cryptocurrency Libra. 

According to Reuters, FATF president Xiangmin Liu laid down the law, indicating that the agency wouldn't be going easy on Libra, noting that if there are significant risks, they will "need to be addressed."

Lui also noted that the obscurity afforded to cryptocurrencies is allowing scope for further subversion of the monetary system, adding:

These activities are likely to be growing quickly, as law enforcement agencies are only seeing the tip of the iceberg.

Creating appropriate anti-money laundering solutions is pivotal to the regulation of cryptocurrencies. In June the FATF laid down new guidelines pertaining to the tackling of money laundering and terrorist financing. 

Nevertheless, Lui shared concerns that the ever-growing nature and speed of cryptocurrency transactions, pose an issue when distinguishing illicit activities:

We have talked about finding suspicious activity as being like finding a needle in a haystack. Well, that haystack is getting bigger and bigger and is moving all the time.

Meanwhile, Libra is still on hold as regulatory scrutiny reaches fever pitch. Most notably the firm has been accused by several antitrust regulators - in both the US and the EU - of anti-competitive behavior. In a prepared statement Libra co-founder, David Markus noted that the proposed digital asset wouldn't launch in any jurisdiction in which it wasn't adequately regulated:

We know we need to take the time to get this right. And I want to be clear: Facebook will not offer the Libra digital currency until we have fully addressed regulatory concerns and received appropriate approvals.

Featured image credit: photo via Pixabay.com.

Why It’s so Difficult to Launder Money on the Blockchain

Written by Andre Kalinowski, founder at blockchain monitoring platform PARSIQ


There is still a common misconception about cryptocurrencies amongst the public. They often regard it as a method for shady deals and illegitimate companies. This stems partially from the fact that one of the first real-world use cases of Bitcoin was its use for payments on the infamous dark web marketplace Silk Road, where anonymous users could buy almost any banned product, ranging from illegal drugs to weapons. Moreover, the authors of ransomware have also hidden behind Bitcoin’s anonymity in the past.

However, while the early days of Bitcoin may have been littered with unscrupulous transactions, modern advances in blockchain analysis mean that it is far more difficult to launder money on the blockchain than many realise. Most cryptocurrencies are far less anonymous than people expect, and transaction history is a lot more traceable than fiat currencies.

With this in mind, we will explore the reasons for why it’s so difficult to actually launder money on the blockchain and debunk the myth that crypto is a good place to carry out shady exchanges.

Less Anonymous Than You Think

In essence, most blockchains are transparent public ledgers. This means that every transaction made can be read by anyone and remains on the ledger forever, with records of the accounts and the inputs and outputs involved in each transaction, so transaction history can be followed back to gain significant knowledge over an individual’s financial affairs.

Another important factor to consider is that while cryptocurrencies were created to be pseudonymous, this anonymity is lost as soon as cryptocurrencies are moved out of the system. Even though crypto wallets comprise a series of letters and numbers that do not provide any information on the account holder, as soon as someone purchases something in crypto using that wallet as an account, or if they were to convert their crypto into fiat currencies, people can trace where the crypto came from and the previous transactions that were made with these specific digital assets.

For example, if you were to hack a crypto exchange, you’d have the perfect tool in cryptocurrencies for moving your newly acquired money around anonymously. However, you would not be able to use this money for anything because as soon as you spend that money, or try to exchange it into fiat, it would be immediately obvious that you were the person that hacked the exchange.

Can Dirty Coins Be Cleaned?

There are a number of ways that crypto criminals might try to “clean” stolen or “dirty” coins. Firstly, they might try manual methods, by mixing transactions of various people in a way that it is not clear anymore what the origin of each participant’s funds is. While this approach may confuse the casual observer trying to track transaction history, tracing is still possible. Moreover, the only way to cash out on these dirty coins is through off-chain services, such as LocalBitcoins, as exchanges are strict about their KYC procedures – but even this can be tough with many off-chain services removing their cash payment option, in order to negate untraceable withdrawals.

An alternative method of laundering illicitly obtained cryptocurrencies is by using a centralised mixer service, such as Bitcoin Laundry, which mixes your transactions with other users’ transactions using an algorithm, in order to obscure your transaction history.

However, while mixer services are more effective that manually mixing transactions yourself, it’s still possible for both human analysts and blockchain analytic software to trace coins passed through a hosted mixer service. In fact, a paper published in 2017 found that many mixer services are not a sophisticated as they appear to be, as their algorithms have a tendency to follow repeated patterns and re-use certain addresses.

A third option, which works best for account-based blockchains such as Ethereum, is to forego the need to trust a third party to mix your coins for you and rely on smart contracts instead. However, this decentralised option still has issues when it comes to privacy, as smart contracts are transparent and so mixer contracts can be easily identified through the deposit and withdrawal history of accounts. Earlier this year, Vitalik Buterin suggested a high-level design for a mixer contract that would avoid transfers being visible on-chain. However, this idea seems far from coming to fruition as it involves off-chain transactions and zero-knowledge proofs.

Tracing Transactions Got a Whole Lot Easier

While mixing coins and transactions can help to obscure transaction history and launder cryptocurrencies on the blockchain, technology continues to evolve to allow us to trace funds, no matter how they have been mixed. There are several blockchain analytics and monitoring tools available on the market which would allow you to track addresses and patterns, enabling you to identify whether certain coins have passed through some form of laundering process.

Thanks to new capabilities in blockchain monitoring and analytics, it’s easy for exchanges to track and trace where coins have come from, meaning they can blacklist certain addresses and reject business from dubious sources. So, despite what many may think, hackers and criminals have their work cut out for them, as laundering money on the blockchain is actually far more difficult than laundering fiat currency.