DASH and NEM's Masternode Systems Cause Unequal Distribution Curves

  • The top 10,000 wallets hold over 90% of the total DASH and NEM supply
  • A Dash masternode costs the equivalent of $338,000 while an NEM masternode costs $780,000
  • The top 10,000 bitcoin wallets hold 56% of the total BTC supply, this is the lowest in its immediate peer group

dash, nem masternodes.pngBased on data from Bitinfocharts.com

While the creation of blockchain technology allowed us to disrupt the way we transact with money, the uneven distribution of cryptocurrency is still an issue preventing Satoshi's vision of a more inclusive financial system from being realized entirely.

Newly minted Bitcoin is distributed exclusively to the miners securing the network, resulting in the top 10000 wallets controlling 55% of the float. With over 15 million wallets holding some measure of Bitcoin, that means that the top 0.07% control more than half the circulating supply.

The disparity between the balances held by crypto 'whales' and those belonging to the rest of the ecosystem can be found to a larger degree amongst projects that forked off Bitcoin. Litecoin, for example, sees the top 10,000 wallets holding 78% while the top 10000 addresses in the Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold hold 66% and 64% respectively.

However, the leading wallets do not represent private individuals, they belong to cryptocurrency exchanges and are used to fund operations. This suggests that investors leave a greater amount of their altcoin holdings on the exchanges, preferring to keep their BTC on private wallets.

DASH and NEM Masternodes

While the distribution inequality amongst Bitcoin and its many forks is not as equal as many want, the situation is worse amongst masternode coins such as Dash and NEM. A Dash masternode costs 1000 Dash, the equivalent of $338,000 according to CryptoCompare data, while an NEM masternode will set you back 3,000,000 NEM or $780,000.

The appeal of generating passive income for operating a masternode has seen 59% of Dash's circulating supply locked up as masternodes. Absent solutions that allow average investors to pool together capital in an effort to set up a masternode, this uneven distribution of wealth amongst masternode coins is set to continue assuming the Dash protocol rewards masternodes with 45% of block rewards.

privacy coins chart.pngBased on data from CryptoCompare

While in theory, locking up a large percentage of token supply in a masternode will reduce the token velocity thereby lowering price volatility, Dash has proven to be one of the more volatile privacy-focused tokens on the market today. The price of masternodes creates inflated buying and selling pressure as masternode operators enter and exit the market with their large holdings.

Formulating a mechanism that allows everyone, not just miners, whales and masternodes, to benefit from the distribution of cryptocurrencies will move us towards a fairer, more equitable financial system.

Ripple XRP Sales Fell 74% in Q3 Amidst Mounting 'FUD'

Michael LaVere
  • Ripple XRP sales fell 74 percent in Q3 2019 according to their most recent report.
  • Blockchain startup says increasing FUD and misinformation about XRP contributed to the decline in sales. 

San Francisco-based blockchain startup Ripple saw a decline in XRP sales of 74% for Q3 2019, with the company citing increased fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) during that timespan. 

According to Ripple’s XRP Markets Report released Oct. 18, the sale of XRP dropped from $251.5 million in Q2 to $66.2 million in Q3, constituting a decrease of 74%. Ripple’s sale of XRP constitutes a portion of the coin’s 100 billion max supply that the company controls, primarily in distribution to institutional clients.

The report states, 

As readers may recall from the previous quarterly report, Ripple publicly announced our intention to shift to a more conservative volume benchmark for our XRP sales, away from CoinMarketCap and to CryptoCompare Top Tier. In the third quarter, we significantly reduced our XRP sales, consistent with the messaging we shared in the Q2 report. For Q3 19, our total XRP sales were $66.24 million vs. $251.51 million in the previous quarter.

While the dollar-amount of XRP sold fell precipitously from Q2 to Q3, the price of XRP also dropped 35% during that time, contributing to the depression in sales. Total XRP volume also declined between the second and third quarter of 2019, falling 53%. 

Ripple claims to have shifted away from “programmatic sales” during Q3 to focus on a “few strategic partners” who are focused on building XRP utility. The report also cites an uptick in “FUD” and the “spread of misinformation” about XRP as contributing to the decline in sales. 

Featured Image Credit: Photo via Pixabay.com